Grace Christian School

Billed Entity 117192 · Alaska

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$8K$22K$11K$11K$16K$22K$16K$16K$14K$21K$17K$17K$11K$11K$14K$9K$9K$6K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%36%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111112111421114422
Avg download speed (Mbps)300300300300300300300300300300
Avg upload speed (Mbps)300300300300300300300300300300

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K
Telecomm Services$4K$12K$2K$2K$13K$8K$8K$6K
Internal Connections$11K$5K$12K$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$8K$8K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$16K$16K$14K$12K$13K$5K$9K$10K$600$2K$432$378
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Grace Christian School$8K$8K$22K$11K$11K$16K$22K$16K$16K$16K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Grace Christian SchoolAnchorage40%5478300300Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.$16K$16K$14K$13K$16K$17K$11K$11K$4K
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.$8K$8K$22K$11K$11K$16K$11K
GCI Communication Corp$12K$920$6K$6K$6K$4K
Alaska COmmunications Systems Holdings, Inc$4K$3K$3K$3K
CDW Government LLC$8K
AT&T Corp
Networks & More, Inc.
Word Enterprises, Ltd.
DSI Inc.
Optimus Technology Company

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.