Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$91K$91K$71K$75K$80K$80K$91K$91K$62K$62K$62K$66K$339K$251K$20K$20K$10K$10K$13K$12K$11K$13K$13K$13K
Average discount rate80%80%80%70%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%70%70%70%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%53%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111111311111111111111112
Avg download speed (Mbps)101010101010101033
Avg upload speed (Mbps)101010101010101033

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$91K$91K$71K$75K$80K$80K$91K$91K$62K$62K$62K$66K$339K$251K$20K$20K$10K$10K$13K$12K$11K$13K$13K$13K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Tuzzy Library$91K$91K$91K$80K$80K$80K$91K$94K$62K$62K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Tuzzy LibraryBarrow80%1010Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.$91K$91K$71K$75K$80K$80K$91K$91K
GCI Communications Corp.$339K$251K$13K$13K$13K
Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative Inc$62K$62K$62K$66K$20K$20K$10K$10K$13K$12K$11K
GTE Alaska Inc.
PCMG, Inc.
Insight Public Sector Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.