Desert Heights Charter Schools

Billed Entity 16027740 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$13K$10K$12K$13K$22K$8K$4K$7K$7K$16K$25K$22K$7K$3K$4K$3K$6K$5K$4K
Average discount rate60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%23%35%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers1122221123423122211
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,000150150150100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0002020202020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$11K
Telecomm Services$1K$1K$5K$3K$1K$1K$3K$2K$2K
Internal Connections$2K$18K$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$13K$10K$12K$11K$4K$4K$4K$7K$5K$5K$24K$21K$2K$2K$1K$3K$3K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Desert Heights Charter Schools$18K$15K$20K$28K$30K$8K$4K$7K$7K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Desert Heights Charter SchoolsGlendale60%8673505,0005,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC$13K$10K$12K$11K$4K$4K$4K$7K$5K$6K$8K$5K$6K$4K$3K$6K$5K$4K
Jive Communications, Inc.$2K$10K$16K$17K
CDW-G$2K$18K$4K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$2K$3K
Edline, LLC$1K
AT&T Mobility$528
AllTel Communications
EQ CONSULTING, INC.
365 Managed IT, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.