Desert Christian School

Billed Entity 16069254 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$12K$11K$16K$9K$11K$11K$11K$10K$10K$14K$14K$12K
Average discount rate40%40%50%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%27%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers12132142442221
Avg download speed (Mbps)42542525017717716816816826715
Avg upload speed (Mbps)4254252527271081081081175

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K
Telecomm Services$12K$11K$11K
Internal Connections$8K$3K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$12K$11K$8K$9K$11K$11K$11K$7K$6K$1K$2K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Desert Christian School$11K$17K$11K$16K$9K$11K$13K$11K$9K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Desert Christian SchoolTucson40%53153500500Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Simply Bits, L.L.C.$11K$8K$9K$11K$11K$11K$7K$10K$13K$14K$12K
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC$12K
Fruth Group$8K
CCIS Solutions, LLC.$3K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$54$720
Arista Networks$384
Counter Trade Products, Inc
Untangle, Inc
Questivity Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.