Arizona Rural Schools Consortium

Billed Entity 17030894 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$53K$58K$59K$70K
Average discount rate77%77%81%83%
Schools & libraries (in this area)6666665333
Service providers1111
Avg download speed (Mbps)950950909909
Avg upload speed (Mbps)950950909909

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$53K$58K$59K$70K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Round Valley District Office$4K$4K$4K$5K$48K$65K$96K
Round Valley Elementary School$7K$9K$4K$33K$10K$16K$21K$48K$513K$31K
Round Valley High School$7K$9K$4K$33K$10K$16K$21K$48K$513K$31K
Round Valley Middle School$7K$9K$4K$33K$10K$16K$21K$48K$513K$31K
St. Johns Unified School District 1 - District Office$5K$5K$6K$6K$48K$53K
Transportation Department$4K$4K$4K$5K$4K$16K$21K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Round Valley District OfficeSpringerville77%1,0001,000
Round Valley Elementary SchoolEager77%5352501,0001,000Rural
Round Valley High SchoolEagar77%395891,0001,000Rural
Round Valley Middle SchoolEagar77%4221811,0001,000Rural
St. Johns Unified School District 1 - District OfficeSt. Johns77%1,0001,000
Transportation DepartmentEagar77%1,0001,000

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
NTUA Wireless, LLC$53K$58K$59K$70K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.