Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$15K$6K$18K$23K$9K$4K$6K$5K$9K$17K$4K$4K$8K$14K$3K$39K$14K$56K
Average discount rate88%88%90%90%88%90%90%54%68%75%83%90%90%90%90%80%90%90%90%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22114112223213222422
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0007507502175050120100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)351,0001,00051875062505012020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$360$749$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K$5K$2K$5K
Internal Connections$9K$2K$2K$12K$5K$8K$32K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$6K$18K$20K$9K$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$1K$1K$829$499$449$2K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$5K$4K$4K$24K$12K$16K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Nosotros Academy$24K$24K$14K$23K$25K$9K$6K$21K$6K$10K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Nosotros AcademyTucson90%3503401,00035Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Enterprise Network Technologies, Inc., dba ENT, Inc.$34K$12K$51K
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC$6K$6K$18K$20K$9K$4K$4K$5K$4K$5K$4K$4K$2K
CCIS Solutions, LLC.$4K$10K
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications$5K$2K$5K
Dell Marketing LP$12K
NetComm Consulting Services, Inc.$2K$2K$5K
BlueAlly Technology Solutions LLC$9K
Electric Lightwave LLC$3K$4K
Eschelon Telecom of Arizona, Inc.$3K
Extreme Integration

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.