St. Mary-Basha Catholic School

Billed Entity 97541 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$10K$7K$1K$1K$1K$3K$2K$2K$716$614$2K$3K$1K$2K$1K$2K$4K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%16%36%40%40%40%40%40%40%60%40%40%40%20%20%20%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111
Service providers2211155344324544333221
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0002001505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,00020201010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$863$614$775$987$568$602$458$1K$2K
Internal Connections$7K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$3K$1K$1K$1K$830$691$716$1K$2K$896$943$638$871$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$4K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St. Mary-Basha Catholic School$15K$12K$2K$3K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St. Mary-Basha Catholic SchoolChandler40%401541,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
U S WEST Communications, Inc.$3K$3K$1K$2K$896$943$638$2K$4K
CIO Now LLC$7K
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC$1K$1K$1K$830$826$691$716
Fruth Group$4K
XO Washington, Inc.$170$888$568$547$458
Sprint Communications Co. L.P.$566$566$576$214$605
Windstream Communications, LLC$2K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$830$287
Eschelon Telecom of Arizona$400
T-Mobile USA, Inc.(fka VoiceStream Wireless Corporation)$99$55

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.