Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$33K$20K$37K$43K$37K$62K$61K$41K$58K$56K$23K$47K$88K$27K$28K$313K$130K$194K
Average discount rate88%90%90%90%88%88%90%50%60%63%79%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers21212212234444445541452
Avg download speed (Mbps)200200300100100100505025
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20020050100100100505025

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$7K$2K
Telecomm Services$18K$7K$10K$18K$5K$10K
Internal Connections$15K$6K$19K$295K$130K$169K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$18K$20K$37K$37K$37K$61K$61K$34K$37K$38K$16K$38K$39K$25K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$32K$21K$18K$18K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Moencopi Day School$35K$20K$6K$37K$43K$37K$65K$85K$43K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Moencopi Day SchoolTuba City85%9492200200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Premise One, Inc.$32K$21K$18K$313K$130K$194K
Commnet of Nevada, LLC$37K$38K$16K$38K$39K
NTUA Wireless, LLC$61K$61K$34K
Wecom, Inc.$18K$20K$37K$37K$37K
Navajo Comm Co, dba Frontier$1K$6K$10K$4K$10K$10K$4K
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC - CONSOLIDATED$3K$7K$2K$10K
Sentinel Technologies, Inc.$19K
Executech Utah, LLC$15K
Smith Bagley, Inc.$785$2K$8K
Flagstaff Information Technology LLC$6K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.