Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$57K$63K$63K$68K$68K$68K$88K$87K$95K$86K$108K$131K$153K$363K$142K$282K$158K$29K$241K
Average discount rate90%88%90%90%90%90%90%30%45%65%81%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers1311111445566666674334544
Avg download speed (Mbps)500500500500500500500100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)500500500500500500500100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$266$887$8K
Telecomm Services$20K$32K$30K$24K$26K$25K
Internal Connections$242K$161K$144K$232K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$57K$63K$63K$68K$68K$68K$87K$86K$86K$86K$88K$99K$97K$97K$77K$64K$29K$10K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$26K$39K$31K$14K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Leupp School, Inc.$63K$81K$63K$68K$68K$68K$90K$95K$105K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Leupp School, Inc.Leupp90%107107500500Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Wecom, Inc.$57K$63K$63K$68K$68K$68K$87K$86K$86K$86K$86K$95K$95K$95K$71K$61K
Sentinel Technologies, Inc.$26K$242K$39K$193K
Techknowledgy Center$29K$241K
Arizona Public Schools Computer Consortium$158K
Navajo Comm Co Inc$6K$19K$19K$19K$17K$19K$23K
Smith Bagley, Inc.$266$887$2K$12K$10K$6K$4K$2K
eChalk Inc.$5K$3K
Qwest Communications Company, LLC$414$1K$1K$938$985$3K$394
Intrafinity Inc$2K$2K
Gaggle.net, Inc.$4K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.