St Clement Elementary School

Billed Entity 108795 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$660$937$2K$584$18K$18K$14K$19K$7K$2K$149$927$2K$2K$732$752$7K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%45%50%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers22222432211122222223464
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000250250250250175100100100100,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,00025025025025070100100100100,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K$149$927$2K$2K$732$752$804
Internal Connections$1K$6K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$18K$18K$12K$18K$7K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$660$937$2K$584
Managed Internal Broadband Services$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Clement Elementary School$6K$7K$7K$10K$8K$23K$22K$14K$19K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Clement Elementary SchoolHayward40%275351,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Windstream Communications, LLC$18K$18K$14K$18K$7K
Gilmore Technolog Services, Inc.$6K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$1K$71$369$703$827$732$672$804
A Computer Guy$660$937$2K$584
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. $1K$78$558$1K$1K
IT Management Corporation$1K
MCI Communications Corporation$80
AT&T Enterprises, LLC
Comcast Business Communications
Apple Computer, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.