Campbell Union H S District

Billed Entity 144325 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$297K$162K$298K$71K$50K$96K$86K$188K$67K$526K$131K$241K$137K$135K$155K$154K$121K$105K$45K$30K$29K$950
Average discount rate60%60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%42%41%47%42%42%48%46%46%46%40%40%42%42%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)6566666666
Service providers7542132225544332444344211
Avg download speed (Mbps)10,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,0005,5003,038
Avg upload speed (Mbps)10,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,00010,0005,5003,038

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$6K$11K
Telecomm Services$120K$135K$134K$132K$151K$154K$121K$105K$45K$30K$29K$950
Internal Connections$252K$101K$248K$21K$46K$20K$125K$443K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$45K$60K$50K$50K$50K$50K$66K$63K$67K$78K$106K$3K$3K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Boynton High School$59K$29K$44K$17K$7K$13K$18K$15K$11K$16K
Camden Community School$59K$44K$17K$7K$9K$10K$10K$11K$16K
Campbell Union High School District Office$15K$9K$7K$7K$7K$7K$10K$10K$11K$16K
Leigh High School$59K$29K$44K$17K$7K$51K$22K$33K$11K$99K
Prospect High School$59K$29K$44K$17K$7K$44K$10K$43K$11K$97K
Westmont High School$59K$29K$44K$17K$7K$16K$10K$31K$11K$112K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Boynton High SchoolSan Jose60%179117100,000100,000Urban
Camden Community SchoolSan Jose60%00100,000100,000Urban
Campbell Union High School District OfficeSan Jose60%100,000100,000
Leigh High SchoolSan Jose60%1,812324100,000100,000Urban
Prospect High SchoolSaratoga60%1,459653100,000100,000Urban
Westmont High SchoolCampbell60%1,741638100,000100,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$43K$130K$115K$121K$120K$126K$133K$112K$95K$36K$27K$29K$950
AMS.NET, Inc.$190K$222K$21K$46K$20K$443K
Zayo Group, LLC$45K$60K$50K$50K$50K$50K$66K$63K$58K$32K
Cingular Wireless$762$955$116K$13K$12K$25K$21K$9K$9K$8K
Ga Technical Services, Inc.$125K
Riverside Technologies, Inc.$54K
SHI International Corpo.$47K
Data Center Warehouse$34K
ConvergeOne, Inc.$28K
Clutch Solutions, LLC$26K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.