Chatom Union School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $11K | $90K | $40K | $25K | $25K | $41K | $34K | $39K | $40K | $120K | $61K | $48K | $22K | $42K | $20K | $31K | $1K | $20K | $39K | $47K | $53K | $8K | $130K | $180K | $181K | $7K | — | $28K |
| Average discount rate | 90% | 88% | 88% | 90% | 90% | 88% | 90% | 58% | 66% | 77% | 82% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 87% | 90% | 90% | 87% | 87% | 87% | 86% | 87% | 80% | 86% | 87% | 80% | — | 80% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | — | 2 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 640 | 486 | 700 | 626 | 626 | 626 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 640 | 486 | 700 | 626 | 626 | 626 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $535 | $2K | $3K | $4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $49K | $39K | $21K | $20K | $20K | $1K | $1K | $19K | $18K | $14K | $18K | $8K | $5K | $4K | — | $7K | — | $2K |
| Internal Connections | — | $64K | $16K | — | — | $15K | — | — | — | $80K | — | — | — | $7K | — | — | — | — | — | — | $35K | — | $125K | $176K | $181K | — | — | $27K |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | $11K | $25K | $23K | $25K | $25K | $25K | $34K | $39K | $39K | $38K | $9K | $9K | $1K | $9K | — | — | — | $1K | $1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | — | $30K | — | — | $19K | $33K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatom Elementary School | $19K | $53K | $22K | $13K | $5K | $17K | $28K | $26K | $26K | $81K |
| Chatom Union Elementary School District Main Office | $5K | $5K | $4K | $4K | $14K | $14K | $9K | $9K | $10K | $10K |
| Mountain View Middle School | $10K | $43K | $22K | $13K | $14K | $18K | $28K | $26K | $26K | $52K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatom Elementary School | Turlock | 90% | 414 | 347 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Rural |
| Chatom Union Elementary School District Main Office | Turlock | 90% | — | — | 100,000 | 100,000 | — |
| Mountain View Middle School | Crows Landing | 90% | 174 | 146 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS.NET, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | $33K | $35K | — | $125K | $176K | $181K | — | — | — |
| Pacific Bell Telephone Company | $11K | $14K | $14K | $16K | $16K | $16K | $25K | $30K | $31K | $31K | $52K | $39K | $20K | $20K | $20K | $1K | $1K | $17K | $13K | $14K | $16K | $8K | $5K | $4K | — | $7K | — | $2K |
| Data Path, Inc | — | $64K | $16K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7K | — | $30K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stanislaus County Office of Education | — | $11K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $1K | $9K | — | — | — | $1K | $1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telcion Communications Group | — | — | — | — | — | $15K | — | — | — | $80K | — | — | — | $5K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| InfiNet Systems Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $27K |
| Solid Networks Inc | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sprint Spectrum, L.P. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2K | $4K | — | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AT&T Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $11 | $35 | $104 | $123 | $139 | $229 | $203 | $193 | $205 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SBC Long Distance, LLC. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $918 | $167 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.