Cuddeback Union Elem Sch Dist

Billed Entity 144513 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$8K$8K$8K$8K$22K$2K$2K$2K$2K$4K$2K$1K$2K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%70%70%25%40%55%70%80%80%80%80%80%77%70%70%70%70%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers21111211444333332333221
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00015010150150150
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00010150101050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$175$534$743
Telecomm Services$2K$1K$2K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K
Internal Connections$22K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$8K$8K$8K$8K$2K$2K$2K$1K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Cuddeback Elementary School$31K$12K$12K$12K$23K$38K$22K$31K$132K$23K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Cuddeback Elementary SchoolCarlotta80%13871100,000100,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$6K$8K$8K$8K$8K$166$488$700$802$1K$1K$5K$5K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K
AAA Network Solutions, Inc.$22K
Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC$2K$2K$2K$1K$3K
AT&T Corporation$4$14$43$62$75$70$66$91$553$1K$1K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$5$32$874$606$754
Development Group, Inc$2K
Verizon Business Global LLC$138
SBC Long Distance, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.