Chicago Park Elem School Dist

Billed Entity 144598 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$35K$2K$27K$36K$28K$23K$23K$6K$5K$4K$5K$5K$5K$4K$4K$5K$6K$6K$3K$2K
Average discount rate70%70%70%80%80%70%46%54%60%65%61%70%70%70%60%60%60%60%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers13132234344334433311
Avg download speed (Mbps)20020020020020020050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20020020020020020050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$443$1K$1K
Telecomm Services$2K$4K$5K$5K$4K$4K$5K$6K$6K$3K$2K
Internal Connections$35K$8K$2K$1K$2K$3K$2K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$27K$28K$26K$22K$21K$990$2K$1K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Chicago Park Elementary School$18K$1K$1K$13K$13K$19K$14K$25K$24K$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Chicago Park Elementary SchoolGrass Valley70%12451100,000100,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
LasVegas.Net, LLC$2K$27K$28K$26K$22K$21K
X-act Technology Solutions, Inc$35K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$4K$4K$4K$3K$2K
Verizon California Inc.$443$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K
GIGAKOM$320$2K$1K$2K$3K$2K
AMS.NET, Inc.$8K
SmarterBroadband Inc.$990$2K$1K$1K
Verizon Long Distance LLC$242$179$187$185$146$129
Verizon Select Services Inc.$99$101
AT&T Corporation

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.