Redding School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $45K | $49K | $50K | $51K | $252K | $82K | $65K | $46K | $471K | $113K | $118K | $140K | $140K | $96K | $92K | $125K | $142K | $160K | $106K | $122K | $133K | $159K | $97K | $59K | $44K | $40K | $54K | $93K |
| Average discount rate | 90% | 90% | 90% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 65% | 53% | 67% | 79% | 80% | 76% | 66% | 66% | 69% | 72% | 74% | 66% | 69% | 66% | 72% | 73% | 59% | 70% | 71% | 75% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 5,385 | 2,500 | 5,385 | 2,545 | 4,636 | 4,150 | 4,118 | 2,332 | 850 | 640 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 5,385 | 2,500 | 5,385 | 2,545 | 4,636 | 4,150 | 4,118 | 2,332 | 850 | 640 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $10K | $9K | $15K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $100K | $116K | $119K | $76K | $64K | $69K | $80K | $102K | $74K | $66K | $74K | $74K | $45K | $42K | $35K | $31K | $26K | $40K |
| Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | $201K | $25K | $21K | — | $348K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $11K | $17K | $9K | $10K | $28K | $53K |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | $45K | $49K | $50K | $51K | $51K | $57K | $44K | $46K | $112K | $104K | $4K | $24K | $22K | $20K | $28K | $56K | $61K | $58K | $33K | $56K | $58K | $85K | $41K | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypress Elementary School | $7K | $6K | $8K | $34K | $29K | $13K | $6K | $6K | $36K | $7K |
| Juniper School | $7K | $6K | $8K | $43K | $38K | $18K | $16K | $19K | $45K | $18K |
| Manzanita Elementary School | $9K | $9K | $10K | $34K | $29K | $15K | $8K | $9K | $89K | $7K |
| Sequoia Middle School | $9K | $9K | $10K | $34K | $29K | $10K | $8K | $9K | $103K | $18K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypress Elementary School | Redding | 85% | 213 | 211 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Urban |
| Juniper School | Redding | 90% | 227 | 225 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Urban |
| Manzanita Elementary School | Redding | 85% | 540 | 393 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Urban |
| Sequoia Middle School | Redding | 85% | 461 | 336 | 100,000 | 100,000 | Urban |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charter Fiberlink CA-CCO, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $108K | $100K | $100K | $73K | $86K | $43K | $38K | $55K | $61K | $57K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pacific Bell Telephone Company | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7K | $2K | $4K | $30K | $24K | $25K | $22K | $22K | $20K | $42K | $51K | $46K | $51K | $48K | $44K | $41K | $33K | $29K | $24K | $40K |
| Comer Comm. Inc. | — | — | — | — | $201K | $25K | $21K | — | $335K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications Operating, LLC | $45K | $49K | $50K | $51K | $51K | $57K | $44K | $41K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| eChalk, L.L.C. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $18K | $18K | $17K | $19K | $28K | $32K | $36K | $33K | $33K | $33K | $35K | $41K | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $934 | $83 | $141 | $15K | $9K | $8K | $7K | $11K | $25K | $22K | $12K | $754 | $546 | $222 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shasta County Office Of Education | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | $5K | $4K | $4K | $4K | $4K | $4K | $3K | $4K | — | — | — | — | — | $50K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sprint Spectrum, L.P. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | $17K | $16K | $20K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Northstate Telephone Svcs. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14K | $9K | — | — | $31K |
| Charter Communications | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $23K | $25K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.