Natomas Charter School

Billed Entity 16024210 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$17K$25K$102K$25K$34K$39K$32K$53K$41K$105K$44K$38K$2K
Average discount rate50%60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%33%40%50%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22333333265541
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,8502,8502,850467467360433400400400
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,8502,8502,850467467360433400400400

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$2K
Telecomm Services$32K$38K
Internal Connections$3K$82K$4K$12K$20K$8K$20K$9K$71K$9K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$16K$21K$19K$19K$19K$18K$16K$33K$33K$32K$125$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K$780$1K$3K$7K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Natomas Charter School$19K$25K$102K$29K$35K$39K$34K$55K$42K$117K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Natomas Charter SchoolSacramento50%1,89056310,00010,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Comcast Business Communications$13K$14K$14K$13K$16K$33K$33K$32K$32K$32K
AMS.NET, Inc.$1K$4K$82K$6K$15K$20K$14K$20K$47K
Comcast Phone, LLC$16K$21K$6K$5K$6K$5K
Sacramento Technology Group LLC$24K
Network Liquidators, Inc.$9K
GIGAKOM$9K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$1K$2K$4K
AT&T Mobility$144$2K
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC$2K
CDW Government LLC$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.