Peabody Charter Elementary School

Billed Entity 106359 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$19K$19K$29K$31K$28K$24K$19K$35K$19K$27K$6K$7K$5K$3K$7K$7K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%40%52%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers222232213331111111
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$3K
Telecomm Services$6K$7K$5K$3K$7K$7K
Internal Connections$7K$21K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$6K$6K$17K$17K$17K$19K$19K$19K$9K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$12K$13K$13K$14K$11K$5K$10K$10K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Peabody Charter Elementary School$21K$22K$36K$35K$37K$33K$29K$20K$37K$20K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Peabody Charter Elementary SchoolSanta Barbara60%7902931,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox California Telcom, LLC$6K$6K$6K$17K$17K$17K$19K$19K$19K$10K$5K$6K$7K$5K
Red Tail Networks, Inc.$11K$5K$10K$10K$21K
Saberdome Corporation$12K$13K$13K$14K
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc.$3K$7K$7K
GIGAKOM$7K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$78$147

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.