Bishop Garcia Diego School

Billed Entity 106381 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$6K$3K$2K$4K$1K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K
Average discount rate40%40%40%30%40%50%50%50%40%40%40%40%40%40%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111
Service providers112222222222433
Avg download speed (Mbps)100100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)100100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$1K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$6K$3K$2K$803$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Bishop Garcia Diego School$6K$6K$6K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bishop Garcia Diego SchoolSanta Barbara40%26542100100Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox California Telcom, LLC$6K$6K$2K$803$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K
Tri-M Communications, Inc.$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$1K
CoxCom, Inc.$3K
Micron Government Computer Systems, LLC
GTE California Incorporated
Santa Barbara County Education Office
Computer Customizing of Santa Barbara
CoxCom, Inc. dba Cox Communications Santa Barbara
Frontier Technology, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.