Riverside County Library System
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | — | — | $737K | — | — | $734K | $837K | $847K | $798K | $809K | $726K | $968K | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.4M | $786K | $711K | $316K | $197K | $196K | $202K | — | $118K | — | — | — | — |
| Average discount rate | — | — | 85% | — | — | 85% | 90% | 70% | 75% | 74% | 82% | 79% | 79% | 81% | 77% | 74% | 73% | 73% | 74% | 70% | 70% | 69% | — | 68% | — | — | — | — |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | — | 9 | — | — | — | — |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | — | — | — | — | — | 7,365 | 7,365 | 10,647 | 10,652 | 10,652 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | — | — | — | — | — | 7,365 | 7,365 | 10,647 | 10,652 | 10,652 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | $7K | $37K | $854 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $449K | $724K | $743K | $786K | $763K | $656K | $532K | $457K | $214K | $197K | $196K | $202K | — | $118K | — | — | — | — |
| Internal Connections | — | — | $737K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $29K | — | $475K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | — | — | — | — | $734K | $837K | $844K | $792K | $773K | $276K | $244K | $268K | $268K | $268K | $254K | $254K | $254K | $102K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desert Hot Springs Branch Library | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | $18K | $18K | $16K | $18K |
| Moreno Valley Public Library | — | — | — | — | — | $18K | $20K | $20K | $19K | $19K |
| Paloma Valley Branch Library | — | — | — | — | — | $16K | $17K | $17K | $16K | $16K |
| Romoland Branch Library | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | $18K | $18K | $16K | $16K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desert Hot Springs Branch Library | Desert Hot Springs | 80% | — | — | 20,000 | 20,000 | Urban |
| Moreno Valley Public Library | Moreno Valley | 80% | — | — | 20,000 | 20,000 | Urban |
| Paloma Valley Branch Library | Menifee | 80% | — | — | 20,000 | 20,000 | Urban |
| Romoland Branch Library | Menifee | 80% | — | — | 20,000 | 20,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verizon California Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $26K | — | $273K | $283K | $293K | $295K | $294K | $218K | $212K | $111K | $91K | $127K | $130K | — | $118K | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications Operating, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | $734K | $837K | $844K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Time Warner Cable Business LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $792K | $773K | $725K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $244K | $268K | $268K | $268K | $254K | $254K | $254K | $102K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Vector Resources, Inc. | — | — | $737K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $29K | — | $475K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Fiberlink CA-CCO, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $162K | $175K | $178K | $178K | $168K | $166K | $154K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pacific Bell Telephone Company | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2K | $7K | $11K | $854 | $106K | $130K | $130K | $130K | $124K | $81K | $28K | $50K | $46K | $36K | $43K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Business Global LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $176K | $130K | $153K | $134K | $47K | $46K | $44K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $6K | $22K | $28K | $26K | $22K | $22K | $19K | $13K | $12K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $38K | $46K | $32K | $29K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.