New Village Charter School

Billed Entity 16050390 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$15K$17K$8K$30K$9K$10K$24K$26K$28K$35K$5K$4K$31K$31K$19K$20K
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%88%90%90%42%54%69%81%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers11112214465456645
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,000550550450300400400200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,000550550450300260260155

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$410$3K$2K$4K
Telecomm Services$4K$4K$3K$4K
Internal Connections$21K$15K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$15K$17K$8K$10K$9K$10K$24K$24K$26K$16K$5K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$27K$27K$16K$16K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
New Village Charter School$17K$17K$8K$30K$12K$26K$25K$27K$37K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
New Village Charter SchoolLos Angeles90%80802,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
JOHN E. DE LEON$21K$15K$27K$27K$16K$16K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$15K$17K$8K$10K$9K$10K$24K
Time Warner Cable Business LLC$24K$26K$16K$5K
Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC$4K$4K$4K$3K
Jive Communications, Inc.$410$1K$2K$4K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$1K$2K
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$2K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)
AT&T Corp.
Digital Networks Group, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.