Chofetz Chaim La Affiliate Dba Yeshivat Ohr Chanoch

Billed Entity 16067292 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$6K$2K$3K$22K$4K$3K
Average discount rate74%74%90%41%45%61%77%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111
Service providers2215588854
Avg download speed (Mbps)25255151518
Avg upload speed (Mbps)25255151516

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$480$1K$1K$3K
Telecomm Services$9K$4K$3K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$5K$403$14K$630
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Chofetz Chaim La Affiliate Dba Yeshivat Ohr Chanoch$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Chofetz Chaim La Affiliate Dba Yeshivat Ohr ChanochLos Angeles60%33132525Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$750$824$17K
Time Warner Cable Business LLC$5K$5K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$480$849$690$2K$4K
Sprint Communications Co. L.P.$4K$2K
AT&T Corp.$1K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$403$480
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$300$545
NTS Solutions, Inc.$497
SBC Long Distance, LLC.
Time Warner Cable

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.