North Routt Community Charter School

Billed Entity 227206 · Colorado

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$4K$561$900$4K$4K$1K$6K$4K$2K$653$756$659$1K$1K$1K$1K$674$2K$2K
Average discount rate25%25%43%34%60%60%60%47%53%60%50%50%50%60%60%60%50%50%50%25%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111
Service providers1111122222221111223544
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,00010,00040404040
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,00010,0002222

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$480$960
Telecomm Services$2K$1K$1K$653$756$659$1K$1K$1K$880$448$2K$2K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$4K$561$900$900$360$295$4K$3K$1K$360$245$226$432
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$3K$3K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
North Routt Community Charter School$3K$3K$4K$900$900$4K$4K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
North Routt Community Charter SchoolClark25%81010,00010,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications, Inc.$561$900$900$840$1K$2K$1K$1K$653$756$659$1K$1K$1K$880$448$1K$1K
CenturyLink Qwest Communications Company, LLC$4K$3K$1K
Luminate Fiber, LLC$3K$4K
Northwest Data Services, LLC$3K$3K
Hughes Network Systems LLC$360$245$180$432
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership$347$230
AT&T Corp.$101$265
SpringSips LP.$46

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.