Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$288$336$210$245$1K$3K$3K$4K$14K$8K$9K$11K$11K$24K$15K$16K$18K$48K$6K$10K$2K
Average discount rate20%20%20%55%55%90%71%33%72%78%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%80%80%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers12211122344443333332434
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000400400400400940101010
Avg upload speed (Mbps)352010202035101010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$8K$9K$8K$8K$9K$10K$11K$11K$11K$6K$9K$2K
Internal Connections$3K$11K$26K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$288$336$210$245$1K$3K$3K$3K$5K$792
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$3K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$7K$11K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Amkids Orlando$384$384$336$210$252$3K$5K$3K$4K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Amkids OrlandoApopka20%5401,00035Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ITC Deltacom Communications, Inc$6K$5K$5K$5K$7K$7K$6K$5K$6K$5K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$427$727$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$5K$6K$6K$2K$5K$2K
Integration One, Inc.$1K$4K$4K$15K$5K$5K$7K
DTNet, Inc.$36K
Bright House Networks, LLC$336$210$245$1K$3K$3K$4K$7K
Grand Computers, LLC$6K
Sprint Local Telephone Division$4K
Sprint Communications Company L.P. (Long Distance Division)$1K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$288
Sprint - Florida, Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.