Putnam County School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | — | $83K | $83K | $509K | $76K | $120K | $86K | $77K | $115K | $119K | $346K | $254K | $210K | $520K | $117K | $379K | $1.5M | $394K | $37K | — | — | $12K | $259K | — | $10K | $16K | $27K | $194K |
| Average discount rate | 90% | 90% | 90% | 87% | 90% | 88% | 88% | 42% | 54% | 56% | 81% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 87% | 90% | 87% | 86% | 80% | — | — | 78% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 78% | 80% | 77% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | — | — | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 7,000 | 8,667 | 8,667 | 8,500 | 5,091 | 5,091 | 4,818 | 4,818 | 1,545 | 1,409 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 7,000 | 8,667 | 8,667 | 8,500 | 5,091 | 5,091 | 4,818 | 4,818 | 1,545 | 1,409 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $9K | $18K | $3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $143K | $150K | $74K | $66K | $82K | $44K | $50K | $33K | — | — | $12K | — | — | $10K | $16K | $19K | $22K |
| Internal Connections | — | — | — | $382K | — | $51K | $29K | — | — | — | $343K | — | — | $394K | — | $169K | $1.4M | $338K | — | — | — | — | $259K | — | — | — | $8K | $172K |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | $83K | $83K | $80K | $76K | $70K | $57K | $77K | $106K | $101K | — | $111K | $60K | — | $51K | $53K | $37K | $6K | $5K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $53K | — | $74K | $51K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | $47K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putnam County Elementary School | $13K | $13K | $13K | $84K | $15K | $29K | $25K | $16K | $21K | $21K |
| Putnam County High School | $13K | $13K | $13K | $84K | $15K | $29K | $25K | $16K | $21K | $21K |
| Putnam County Middle School | $13K | $13K | $13K | $84K | $15K | $29K | $25K | $16K | $21K | $21K |
| Putnam County Primary School | $13K | $13K | $13K | $84K | $15K | $22K | $15K | $16K | $21K | $21K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putnam County Elementary School | Eatonton | 85% | 568 | 568 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
| Putnam County High School | Eatonton | 85% | 839 | 702 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
| Putnam County Middle School | Eatonton | 85% | 650 | 481 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
| Putnam County Primary School | Eatonton | 85% | 639 | 639 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micro Technology Consultants, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | $51K | $29K | — | — | — | $343K | — | — | $446K | — | $243K | $1.3M | $338K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications Operating, LLC | — | $83K | $83K | $80K | $76K | $70K | $57K | $77K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 Accord Technologies, LLC. | — | — | — | $429K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AT&T Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | — | $110K | $122K | $63K | $14K | $68K | $10K | $17K | $10K | — | — | $4K | — | — | $1K | $1K | — | — |
| Richardson Technology Systems, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $80K | — | — | — | — | — | $259K | — | — | — | — | — |
| BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $91K | $53K | $61K | $28K | $20K | — | — | $8K | — | — | $9K | $15K | $19K | $22K |
| Charter Fiberlink-Georgia, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $90K | $80K | — | $82K | $74K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Techlan, Inc | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $8K | $172K |
| Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $911 | $1K | $3K | $17K | $11K | $11K | $9K | $11K | $9K | $10K | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $16K | $21K | — | $24K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.