Snake River School District 52

Billed Entity 142588 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$92K$126K$30K$54K$25K$25K$442K$54K$66K$189K$61K$13K$19K$15K$20K$22K$21K$21K$16K$2K$22K$21K$19K$24K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%71%70%70%62%65%74%74%75%75%67%72%72%69%69%73%69%67%69%67%66%66%
Schools & libraries (in this area)7777667677
Service providers221333313533352333333244446
Avg download speed (Mbps)6,0006,0006,0008,8758,7148,7146,400229154100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)6,0006,0006,0008,8758,7148,7146,400229154100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$13K$12K$15K$13K$15K$14K$14K$9K$2K$17K$16K$15K$18K
Internal Connections$61K$94K$29K$41K$136K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$32K$32K$30K$25K$25K$25K$401K$54K$66K$53K$61K$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K$5K$5K$5K$6K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Moreland Elementary School$5K$20K$5K$7K$3K$3K$74K$7K$9K$26K
Riverside Elementary School$5K$20K$5K$7K$3K$3K$75K$7K$9K$18K
Rockford Elementary School$5K$20K$5K$7K$3K$3K$69K$7K$9K$20K
Snake River District 52$5K$5K$5K$2K$3K$3K$65K$7K$9K$533
Snake River High School$65K$20K$5K$17K$13K$13K$79K$19K$18K$76K
Snake River Junior High School$5K$20K$5K$7K$8K$2K$23K
Snake River Middle School$5K$20K$5K$7K$3K$3K$73K$7K$9K$30K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Moreland Elementary SchoolMoreland60%26510410,00010,000Rural
Riverside Elementary SchoolBlackfoot60%26511310,00010,000Rural
Rockford Elementary SchoolBlackfoot60%1394910,00010,000Rural
Snake River District 52Blackfoot60%10,00010,000
Snake River High SchoolBlackfoot60%56513610,00010,000Rural
Snake River Junior High SchoolBlackfoot60%3169910,00010,000Rural
Snake River Middle SchoolBlackfoot60%2819710,00010,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Fatbeam, LLC$32K$32K$30K$15K$15K$15K$388K$13K$136K
ENA Services, LLC$10K$10K$10K$55K$54K$53K$53K$52K$7K
Ednetics, Inc.$61K$94K
US-West Communications, Inc.$9K$9K$9K$8K$9K$9K$9K$9K$15K$15K$15K$18K
Qwest Communications Corporation$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$4K$2K$6K$5K$6K$2K$4K$3K$3K
CompuNet, Inc.$29K
AllTel Communications$6K$5K
Idaho State University Computer Center$2K$2K$2K$2K
Tek-Hut, Inc$8K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.