North Bingham Co District Lib

Billed Entity 142605 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$2K$4K$4K$4K$3K$6K$928$1K$2K$2K$2K$1K$2K$1K$813$850$850$733$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K
Average discount rate70%80%70%70%70%70%70%70%40%50%60%70%70%70%70%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%60%67%67%75%66%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111111112221111111123333333
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000250250250100100100505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,000250250250100100100333

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$252$727$1K
Telecomm Services$2K$1K$2K$1K$813$850$850$733$883$892$1K$1K$1K$2K$996
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$4K$4K$4K$3K$6K$928$928$928$928$480$480$720$804$804$132
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
North Bingham Co District Lib$2K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$8K$928$1K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
North Bingham Co District LibShelley70%1,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Direct Communications - Rockland, Inc.$2K$4K$4K$4K$3K$6K
U S West Communications, Inc.$2K$813$850$733$754$762$1K$1K$1K$1K$941
Qwest Communications Corporation$252$727$1K$2K$1K$1K$850
Cable One, Inc.$928$928$928$928
MicroServ Telecomputing$480$480$720$804$804$180$132
AT&T Corp.$130$130$144$80$80$90$56

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.