Valley School District 262

Billed Entity 142634 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$23K$31K$52K$36K$36K$36K$45K$39K$31K$27K$26K$33K$33K$30K$26K$8K$8K$9K$5K$5K$4K$9K$9K$6K$3K$2K
Average discount rate70%70%80%80%80%80%80%80%65%67%76%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%76%72%77%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2131222222123332111111111111
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000600600600600600500300200100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,000600600600600600500300200100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$3K$5K
Telecomm Services$8K$8K$5K$6K$2K
Internal Connections$13K$16K$7K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$10K$31K$36K$36K$36K$36K$39K$39K$29K$20K$20K$25K$25K$25K$20K$8K$8K$9K$5K$5K$4K$9K$9K$6K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$4K$1K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Valley Schools$23K$31K$52K$36K$36K$36K$45K$39K$31K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Valley SchoolsHazelton80%4652761,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Fatbeam, LLC$10K$31K$36K$36K$36K$36K$45K$39K$31K$27K
Tek-Hut, Inc$26K$33K$14K$6K$6K$2K$8K$9K
ONEWAVE NETWORKS, LLC$20K$20K$14K$6K
Solutionpro, Inc.$9K$9K$6K$3K$2K
Ednetics, Inc.$13K$14K
Qwest Communications Corporation$5K$5K$4K
Qwest Corporation$6K
Syringa Networks, LLC.$5K
Computer Zen LLC$2K
Eminent Technical Solutions LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.