Notus School District 135

Billed Entity 142740 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$19K$26K$43K$37K$15K$14K$14K$14K$19K$21K$21K$5K$6K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%46%60%70%80%80%80%75%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers111111133442222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,000350350300300300100200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,000350350300300300100200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$909$3K$4K
Telecomm Services$5K$6K
Internal Connections$18K$19K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$19K$23K$21K$16K$15K$14K$14K$14K$18K$18K$17K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$4K$4K$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Notus Elementary School$11K$13K$24K$19K$8K$7K$7K$9K$10K$14K
Notus High School$11K$13K$24K$19K$8K$7K$7K$9K$10K$14K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Notus Elementary SchoolNotus60%139341,0001,000Rural
Notus High SchoolNotus60%145631,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ENA Services, LLC$19K$26K$43K$37K$15K$14K$14K$14K$17K
Education Networks of America, Inc.$18K$18K
CenturyLink Qwest Corporation$573$3K$3K$3K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$336$926$1K$2K$3K
CenturyLink Qwest Communications Company, LLC$2K
Insight Public Sector Inc
PCMG, Inc.
Right! Systems
System Tech, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.