Chaney-Monge School Dist 88

Billed Entity 135555 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$29K$25K$24K$22K$31K$29K$43K$40K$33K$16K$19K$15K$9K
Average discount rate88%88%88%87%87%88%88%62%65%70%80%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers3333333443454
Avg download speed (Mbps)62562562562562529083505035
Avg upload speed (Mbps)17517517517517510270303015

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$943$2K$3K$5K
Telecomm Services$14K$5K$5K
Internal Connections$13K$14K$21K$21K$20K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$12K$14K$13K$13K$14K$13K$11K$12K$12K$14K$10K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$629
Managed Internal Broadband Services$17K$11K$11K$8K$5K$2K$10K$6K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Chaney Elementary School$14K$12K$12K$11K$16K$28K$37K$22K$17K$9K
Monge Jr High School$14K$12K$12K$11K$16K$7K$6K$18K$17K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Chaney Elementary SchoolCrest Hill90%4254251,000250Urban
Monge Jr High SchoolCrest Hill90%001,000250Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
True Tech Systems, Inc.$17K$11K$11K$9K$17K$16K$31K$27K$20K$480
Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC$10K$10K$10K$10K$11K$13K$4K$3K$5K
AT&T Enterprises, LLC$6K$11K$10K$9K$11K$8K
Comcast Business Communications$6K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
AT&T Mobility$136$408$668$789$2K$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.