Waterloo School District 5

Billed Entity 136505 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$11K$37K$36K$26K$34K$34K$38K$44K$44K$43K$42K$41K$42K$32K$19K$14K$23K$6K$9K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%45%50%53%52%47%45%45%45%43%40%40%52%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers123223333511122211111111
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,000750500300
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,000750500300

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K$5K
Telecomm Services$8K$17K$16K$20K$19K$28K$24K$13K$10K$16K$6K$9K
Internal Connections$11K$8K$8K$7K$6K$1K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$29K$29K$26K$26K$29K$31K$31K$27K$27K$22K$22K$14K$8K$5K$4K$7K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
W J Zahnow Elementary School$3K$1K$4K$6K$7K$8K$6K$7K$8K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
W J Zahnow Elementary SchoolWaterloo60%4087520,00020,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Harrisonville Telephone Company$29K$26K$26K$29K$35K$44K$44K$43K$41K$39K$36K$32K$19K$14K$23K$6K$9K
HTC Communications Co.$29K$165
CDW Government LLC$7K$8K$6K$4K
Sidebarr Technologies Inc.$2K$7K$2K$1K
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC - CONSOLIDATED$1K$2K$6K
Sterling Computers Corporation$4K
Connected LLC$2K
Technology Plus LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.