Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$22K$3K$3K$3K$3K$17K$17K$18K$7K$5K$22K$17K$8K$9K$9K$9K$10K$974$6K
Average discount rate80%85%70%70%70%70%70%70%34%50%62%66%67%64%60%67%66%66%66%66%66%66%65%64%60%67%
Schools & libraries (in this area)22222222
Service providers21111122443333222222245312
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001001003026
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001001,0003018

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$4K$13K$15K$5K$5K$5K$5K$10K$974$6K
Internal Connections$20K$2K$2K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$17K$16K$16K$7K$778$9K$2K$3K$4K$4K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$854
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Palestine Grade School$13K$2K$1K$1K$2K$8K$18K$9K
Palestine High School$13K$2K$1K$1K$2K$8K$18K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Palestine Grade SchoolPalestine80%2211541,0001,000Rural
Palestine High SchoolPalestine80%86601,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
MCC Telephony, LLC$16K$16K$7K$14K$9K
Verizon North Incorporated$5K$6K$6K$6K$7K$7K$7K$8K$974$6K
Wabash Independent Networks$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$17K
Charley, Inc.$20K$2K$3K
AT&T Corporation$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Resource Communications, Inc.
Hewlett Packard Company
Kemper Computer Consultants, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.