Cheder Lubavitch Girls School

Billed Entity 16056588 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$6K$26K$39K$30K$2K$165K$6K$3K
Average discount rate80%80%84%30%60%70%82%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111
Service providers112444465654
Avg download speed (Mbps)5005005006060104
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5005005002525105

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K
Telecomm Services$35K$3K$1K$6K$5K$3K
Internal Connections$20K$159K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$6K$6K$833$26K$787$448$634
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Cheder Lubavitch Girls School$7K$7K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Cheder Lubavitch Girls SchoolChicago90%159120500500Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Light House Equity, Inc.$159K
Brooklyn Mailing & Communications$35K
AV Conference Solutions, Inc.$25K
Comcast Business Communications$6K$6K$6K$833$901$787$448$634
KBC Computer Services LTD$20K
U.S. Cellular$3K$4K$2K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$2K$3K$1K$720
AT&T Corp.$313$2K
AT&T Mobility$2K
Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.