Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$16K$2K$3K$5K$5K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$875$1K$1K$758
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%33%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers11111123333333233422222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000150100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000150100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$742
Telecomm Services$2K$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$875$907$926$758
Internal Connections$15K$1K$2K$4K$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$900$955$165$114$131
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Peter School$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K$22K$8K$3K$6K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Peter SchoolQuincy40%433251,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Adams TelSystems, Inc.$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$742$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$627
CDS Office Technologies$15K
CDW Government LLC$2K$4K
ATT Mobility$287$141$761$678$646$580$892
Eric Thomas Creations, Inc.$4K
Adams Networks, Inc.$1K$900$955$165$114$131
Windstream Communications, Inc.$176$907$926$758
Illinois Bell Telephone Company$627$1K
CMS Communications, Inc.$1K
AT&T Corporation$700

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.