Tri-County School Corporation
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $115K | $58K | $58K | $58K | $57K | $60K | $93K | $60K | $124K | $109K | $102K | $104K | $81K | $40K | $29K | $21K | — | $9K | $9K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $7K | $8K | $8K | $5K | $10K |
| Average discount rate | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 58% | 50% | 60% | 65% | 65% | 70% | 65% | 65% | 65% | 64% | 65% | 62% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 54% | 54% | 53% | 53% | 51% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 9,000 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 650 | 650 | 650 | 463 | 650 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 9,000 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 2,750 | 650 | 650 | 650 | 463 | 650 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $369 | $4K | $546 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $68K | $73K | $49K | $10K | $9K | $9K | — | $9K | $9K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $7K | $8K | $8K | $5K | $10K |
| Internal Connections | $74K | — | — | — | — | — | $33K | — | $27K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | $41K | $58K | $58K | $58K | $57K | $60K | $60K | $60K | $97K | $104K | $34K | $32K | $31K | $30K | $19K | $12K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tri-County Intermediate School | $37K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $15K | $26K | $15K | $35K | $34K |
| Tri-County Jr-Sr High School | $55K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $15K | $26K | $15K | $42K | $43K |
| Tri-County Primary School | $37K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $15K | $26K | $15K | $27K | $43K |
| Tri-County School Corporation Central Office | $12K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $14K | $15K | $15K | $15K | $23K | $43K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tri-County Intermediate School | Wolcott | 70% | 252 | 96 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Tri-County Jr-Sr High School | Wolcott | 70% | 331 | 130 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Tri-County Primary School | Remington | 70% | 162 | 59 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Tri-County School Corporation Central Office | Wolcott | 70% | — | — | 10,000 | 10,000 | — |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENA Services, LLC | $41K | $58K | $58K | $58K | $57K | $60K | $60K | $60K | $97K | $104K | $101K | $94K | $71K | $29K | $18K | $11K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CDW Government LLC | $74K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sprint - Local Telephone Division | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $9K | $9K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $7K | $7K | $6K | — | — |
| Embarq - United Telephone Co. of Indiana FKA Sprint | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $341 | $4K | $256 | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | $9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Chester, Incorporated | — | — | — | — | — | — | $33K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cablexpress Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| N2N Technologies, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $13K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sprint Communications Company L.P. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K | $5K |
| Ameritech Advanced Data Services, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K |
| One Technologies, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $727 | $646 | $797 | $646 | $646 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.