Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$27K$29K$6K$2K$5K$4K$5K$5K$5K$1K$4K$2K$1K$4K$4K$6K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%27%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111
Service providers1122233333133334331
Avg download speed (Mbps)100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1515

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K
Telecomm Services$4K$3K$4K$4K$4K$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K$2K$3K
Internal Connections$3K$27K$28K$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$1K$1K$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$3K$3K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$347$174
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Mater Dei High School$3K$27K$29K$6K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Mater Dei High SchoolEvansville40%5465210015Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Five-Star Technology Solutions$3K$27K
Sigecom, LLC$1K$1K$2K$3K$2K$3K$3K$3K$1K$934$2K$1K$1K$1K$3K
Matrix Integration LLC$28K
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership$371$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$792$219
Norlight Telecommunications, Inc.$2K$3K$3K$3K
North Main Systems$5K
Edline, LLC$493$359$359$359
Cingular Wireless Inc.$463
Cinergy Communications Company
Keller Schroeder & Associates, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.