Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$5K$5K$11K$12K$5K$7K$5K$9K$5K$4K$5K$4K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$5K$4K$9K$11K$7K$2K$23K$41K$12K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%68%63%60%70%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%77%76%70%76%70%75%74%74%66%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111211122222222222211123213
Avg download speed (Mbps)5005005005005005005001005050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)25025025050050025025050253

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$373$785$2K$2K
Telecomm Services$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$8K$9K$5K$1K$20K$23K$12K
Internal Connections$6K$7K$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K$6K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$845$912$3K$2K$803$2K$2K$840$3K$18K$240
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$898$1K$2K$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Lewis Elementary$5K$5K$5K$11K$12K$5K$7K$5K$9K$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Lewis ElementaryLewis90%6549500250Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
The Golden Belt Telephone Association, Inc.$5K$5K$5K$11K$5K$5K$7K$5K$9K$5K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$5K$4K$9K$11K$7K$2K$23K$41K$10K
Frugal,Inc.$7K
Nex-Tech Wireless. LLC$38$144$216$400$384$384$384$384$403$432$422$370
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$2K
Rural Tel. Service Co. Inc.
Apple Computer, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.