St Mary Catholic School

Billed Entity 77476 · Kansas

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$686$749$749$874$873$790$6K$3K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$4K$3K$3K$2K$1K$960$750$750$713$1K$1K$5K
Average discount rate60%60%60%70%70%70%70%70%50%53%67%80%80%80%80%60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111112223333333211111223
Avg download speed (Mbps)1001001001001005050505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20202020201010101010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$1K
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$3K$3K$2K$2K$1K$960$750$750$713$1K$1K$2K
Internal Connections$5K$2K$2K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$686$749$749$874$873$790$790$790$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$768$576$619
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Mary Catholic School$749$749$749$874$874$790$6K$5K$3K$3K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Mary Catholic SchoolNewton60%1222810020Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Birch Telecom, Inc.$990$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$960$750$750$713$767$942$2K
Cox Communications Kansas, LLC$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$768$576
Cox Kansas Telcom, LLC$686$749$749$874$873$790$790$790
Electronaca Inc$5K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$14$86$182$218$762$768$576$360
Rev Ron, Inc. $2K
Frugal,Inc.$2K
Sprint/United Tel. Co. of Kansas$435$421
McCaw RCC Communications, Inc$107

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.