Better Choice Foundation- Mary D. Coghill Charter School

Billed Entity 16072726 · Louisiana

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$48K$51K$38K$40K$44K$37K$34K
Average discount rate88%41%53%65%77%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111
Service providers2433366
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0001,000100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0001,000100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$2K$7K$11K
Telecomm Services$22K$9K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$33K$33K$19K$17K$17K$16K$25K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$15K$16K$16K$16K$16K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Better Choice Foundation- Mary D. Coghill Charter School$58K$64K$45K$49K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Better Choice Foundation- Mary D. Coghill Charter SchoolNew Orleans90%5965962,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox Louisiana Telcom, LLC$16K$36K$35K$35K$16K$17K
Cox Commuications Louisiana, LLC$33K$33K
Hunt Telecommunications, LLC$526$2K$3K$5K$10K$10K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$822$3K$4K$8K$6K
ICT, Inc. Computer$15K
Educational Networks, Inc.$3K$1K
Gaggle.net, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.