Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$1K$3K$6K$7K$25K$15K$12K$12K$11K$21K$11K$20K$14K$13K$2K$6K$4K
Average discount rate20%20%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%30%40%40%40%40%20%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2111232223455512222
Avg download speed (Mbps)75075075075075057557551137461
Avg upload speed (Mbps)75075075075075057557551137461

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$671
Telecomm Services$5K$3K$3K$2K$6K$4K
Internal Connections$18K$8K$12K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$1K$3K$6K$7K$7K$7K$12K$12K$11K$8K$11K$15K$11K$10K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Gann Academy$3K$3K$6K$7K$25K$15K$12K$12K$12K$21K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Gann AcademyWaltham20%35031,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
TowerStream Corporation$11K$11K$11K$8K$8K$10K$10K$10K
Whally Computer Associates, Inc.$18K$8K$12K
RCN Telecom Services of Massachusetts, LLC$1K$3K$6K$7K$7K$6K
Comcast Business Communications$921$857$600$600$600$3K$3K$2K$255
WhippleHill Communications, Inc.$5K$1K
AT&T Corp.$4K$1K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$225$2K$192$2K
Verizon-New England Inc.$2K$2K
Choice One Communications of Massachusetts, Inc.$240$480$480$1K
Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.