Paynesville School Dist 741

Billed Entity 133934 · Minnesota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$14K$14K$14K$28K$96K$37K$20K$18K$11K$43K$34K$2K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%70%70%70%70%70%70%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2233333333
Service providers2112221111112
Avg download speed (Mbps)3,0003,0003,0003,0003,0001,0001,0001,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)3,0003,0003,0003,0003,0001,0001,0001,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K
Internal Connections$13K$82K$18K$11K$41K$34K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$13K$14K$14K$14K$14K$20K$20K$18K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$2K
Managed Internal Broadband Services$694

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Paynesville Area Secondary$8K$7K$5K$9K$32K$15K$7K$7K$14K$23K
Paynesville Elementary$8K$7K$5K$9K$32K$9K$7K$7K$14K$23K
Paynesville Middle$5K$9K$32K$14K$7K$7K$9K$23K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Paynesville Area SecondaryPaynesville60%4831443,0003,000Rural
Paynesville ElementaryPaynesville60%4341273,0003,000Rural
Paynesville MiddlePaynesville60%210663,0003,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Tekstar Communications, Inc.$13K$14K$14K$14K$14K$20K$20K$18K
Tech Check, LLC$694$13K$18K$11K$43K$34K
Electrical Production Services$82K
TDS Metrocom$2K
OneStar Long Distance, Inc.
Windstream Communications, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.