Bagley School District 162

Billed Entity 134009 · Minnesota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$9K$10K$45K$63K$7K$3K$3K$78K$11K$52K$20K$19K$16K$13K$46K$11K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%75%80%80%71%67%75%76%76%75%80%80%75%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers12222221212222222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001001006868
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001001006767

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K$8K$12K
Telecomm Services$2K$15K$14K$11K$13K$13K$11K
Internal Connections$37K$53K$71K$38K$34K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$433$5K$5K$5K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$6K$8K$8K$7K$5K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Bagley Elementary School$7K$14K$14K$32K$40K$17K$12K$10K$60K$17K
Bagley Secondary School$7K$14K$14K$32K$40K$17K$15K$10K$36K$17K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bagley Elementary SchoolBagley80%5103121,0001,000Rural
Bagley Secondary SchoolBagley80%4262591,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Tech Check, LLC$6K$8K$45K$61K$5K$71K$38K$34K
Garden Valley Telephone Company$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$3K$3K$7K$11K$15K$18K$17K$14K$13K$13K$11K
Midwest Internet Consulting Group, Inc$2K$2K$2K
Qwest Communications Corporation

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.