Augsberg Fairview Academy 4111-07

Billed Entity 16076839 · Minnesota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$12K$14K$13K$20K$20K$11K$15K$27K$26K$17K$811$113K
Average discount rate90%90%86%86%86%80%87%49%71%76%79%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers112221245555
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000501501
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000501501

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$493$2K$3K$811
Telecomm Services$111K
Internal Connections$9K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$12K$14K$10K$10K$12K$11K$12K$24K$24K$5K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$3K$10K$8K$2K$2K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Augsberg Fairview Academy 4111-07$13K$14K$13K$20K$20K$11K$15K$28K$33K$43K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Augsberg Fairview Academy 4111-07Minneapolis90%87801,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
T-Mobile USA, Inc.$120$107K
Tekstar Communications, Inc.$12K$14K$10K$10K$12K$11K$12K
Comcast Business Communications$24K$24K$5K$2K
Daotech Solutions LLC$3K$10K$8K$2K$2K
Advanced Productivity Computing, Inc$9K
Velocity Telephone, Inc.$406$1K$2K$4K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$87$318$526$692
Phone Station, Inc
Computer Integration Technologies, Inc. (CIT)
AT&T Mobility

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.