Lake Of The Woods School District

Billed Entity 205161 · Minnesota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$18K$21K$12K$80$48K$777$18K$19K$18K$17K$16K$1K$7K$3K
Average discount rate70%70%70%20%56%60%80%80%80%80%70%70%70%70%70%70%70%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers12134333333333333
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$80$911$777
Telecomm Services$18K$19K$18K$17K$16K$1K$7K$3K
Internal Connections$18K$21K$12K$47K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Lake Of The Woods Elem School$9K$12K$22K$24K$18K$13K$14K$14K$14K$48K
Lake Of The Woods Secondary$9K$12K$22K$24K$18K$13K$14K$14K$14K$41K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Lake Of The Woods Elem SchoolBaudette60%230821,0001,000Rural
Lake Of The Woods SecondaryBaudette60%228761,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Tech Check, LLC$18K$15K$12K$47K
CenturyTel of Minnesota, Inc.$14K$14K$14K$14K$13K$6K
Sprint Communications Company L.P. (Long Distance Division)$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$80$412$777$2K$3K$2K$2K
Wikstrom Telephone Company, Inc.$6K
Rural Cellular Corporation$2K$882$1K
Rochester Telecom Systems, Inc.$498
Cellular One

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.