Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$1K$5K$7K$11K$7K$8K$9K$8K$10K$12K$17K$33K$23K$30K$24K$18K$18K$12K$6K$4K$6K$6K$6K$8K
Average discount rate56%90%90%88%90%90%88%37%50%63%77%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2112112222234434453211211
Avg download speed (Mbps)600600600600600500100100100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)600600600600600500100100100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$4K$6K$11K
Telecomm Services$27K$17K$21K$21K$16K$15K$12K$5K$4K$6K$6K$6K$8K
Internal Connections$4K$3K$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$1K$5K$7K$7K$7K$8K$6K$6K$6K$6K$6K$6K$5K$4K$4K$3K$3K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Nexus - Gerard$5K$5K$8K$11K$8K$8K$9K$8K$10K$12K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Nexus - GerardAustin85%9393600600Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Jaguar Communications Inc$8K$6K$7K$9K$9K$12K$26K$13K$348$1K
Qwest Communications Company, LLC$212$2K$14K$14K$8K$6K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$587$2K$3K$4K$7K$7K$7K$6K$5K$976
Metro Fibernet LLC$1K$5K$7K$7K$7K
Windstream Communications, Inc.$294$4K$4K$3K$3K$6K$8K
Qwest Corporation$2K$14K$6K$4K
TDS Metrocom$4K$6K$6K
Dell Marketing LP$5K
Technology By Design LLC$4K
Streakwave Wireless, Inc.$3K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.