Ridgeway Community School

Billed Entity 233274 · Minnesota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$3K$4K$4K$4K$1K$1K$1K$5K$6K$1K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$729$136$1K$2K$2K$2K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%30%40%47%60%60%70%60%60%60%60%60%70%70%70%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22222111332322232232222
Avg download speed (Mbps)500500300300300300213125125125
Avg upload speed (Mbps)30303030303025202020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$520$1K
Telecomm Services$1K$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$729$136$1K$1K$1K$1K
Internal Connections$2K$3K$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$891$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$216$440$216$210$346$853$888
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K
Managed Internal Broadband Services$2K$2K$2K$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Ridgeway Community School$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$1K$1K$1K$5K$7K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Ridgeway Community SchoolHouston60%1022750030Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
UP N Running Consulting, Inc$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$3K$4K
Ace Telephone Association$891$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$365$441$436$252$177$167$152$93$136$354$479$853$540
Digital Telecommunications, Inc.$420$1K$636$1K$1K$1K$2K
Qwest Corporation$443$851$1K$1K$1K$1K$565
Distributed Website Corporation$224
Buercks Consulting

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.