Atlanta School District C 3

Billed Entity 136981 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$12K$12K$12K$8K$1K$960$19K$1K$2K$6K$6K$7K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K
Average discount rate70%70%70%70%70%79%80%75%58%30%60%60%80%38%80%80%80%75%79%79%75%75%70%67%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers222222112111111111111112
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00030015010075
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0003001501075

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$227$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$6K$6K$7K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K
Internal Connections$5K$18K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$960$672
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$10K$10K$10K$7K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Atlanta Elementary School$819$3K$6K$6K$6K$4K$576$480$13K$16K
Atlanta High School$819$3K$6K$6K$6K$4K$576$480$32K$16K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Atlanta Elementary SchoolAtlanta70%113431,0001,000Rural
Atlanta High SchoolAtlanta70%92301,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Chariton Valley Telecom Corporation$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$960$899$1K$2K$6K$6K$7K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K
Quality Network Solutions, Inc$5K$10K$10K$10K$7K$18K
Chariton Valley Broadband LLC$2K
The Computer Junction, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.