Richmond School District R 16
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | — | $61K | — | $55K | $76K | $76K | $87K | $122K | $90K | $81K | $120K | $93K | $58K | $48K | $61K | $57K | $57K | $13K | $11K | $18K | $15K | $17K | $15K | $18K | $15K | $2K | — | — |
| Average discount rate | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 50% | 46% | 71% | 67% | 69% | 66% | 70% | 61% | 60% | 60% | 57% | 57% | 54% | 56% | 54% | 55% | 51% | 54% | — | — |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 1,000 | — | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 811 | 312 | 312 | 525 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 1,000 | — | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 811 | 312 | 312 | 525 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | $7K | $12K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $21K | $14K | $41K | $49K | $57K | $57K | $13K | $11K | $17K | $14K | $16K | $15K | $18K | $15K | $2K | — | — |
| Internal Connections | — | $61K | — | — | — | — | $11K | $69K | $13K | — | $23K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | — | — | $55K | $76K | $76K | $76K | $53K | $76K | $74K | $85K | $72K | $44K | $7K | $12K | — | — | — | — | $314 | $596 | $331 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond High School | $14K | $15K | $14K | $14K | $19K | $19K | $27K | $44K | $25K | $21K |
| Richmond Middle School | $14K | $15K | $14K | $14K | $19K | $19K | $22K | $46K | $25K | $21K |
| Sunrise Elementary School | $14K | $15K | $14K | $14K | $19K | $19K | $19K | $60K | $21K | $21K |
| Woodson-Dear Elem School | $14K | $15K | $14K | $14K | $19K | $19K | $19K | $24K | $19K | $21K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond High School | Richmond | 70% | 458 | 161 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Richmond Middle School | Richmond | 70% | 354 | 179 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Sunrise Elementary School | Richmond | 70% | 461 | 234 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Woodson-Dear Elem School | Richmond | 70% | 244 | 128 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worldwide Technologies, Inc | — | $34K | — | $55K | $76K | $76K | $76K | $53K | $82K | $25K | $52K | $24K | $12K | $7K | $12K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Unite Private Networks, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $49K | $56K | $47K | $32K | $28K | $49K | $43K | $42K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $779 | $5K | $7K | $17K | $11K | $10K | — | $13K | $14K | $8K | $7K | $16K | $12K | $15K | $13K | $14K | $13K | — | — | — |
| k12 ITC Inc | — | $19K | — | — | — | — | $11K | $69K | $6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SBC Long Distance, LLC. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $720 | $2K | $4K | $2K | $3K | — | — | — | — | $5K | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| T-Mobile USA, Inc.(fka VoiceStream Wireless Corporation) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | — | $2K | $1K | — | $2K | $2K | $2K | $1K | $1K | $1K | — | — | — | — |
| Riverside Technologies, Inc. | — | $8K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AT&T Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | $2K | $2K | $2K | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $258 | $841 | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mediacom Southeast LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $314 | $596 | $331 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.