Blessed Teresa Of Calcutta Catholic School

Billed Entity 16039698 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$6K$12K$738$860$2K$2K$528$918
Average discount rate60%60%60%30%40%50%50%50%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111
Service providers22222223331
Avg download speed (Mbps)400150150100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20567

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$138$260
Telecomm Services$864$605$460$702
Internal Connections$2K$5K$11K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$720$720$720$600$600$1K$1K$68$216
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Blessed Teresa Of Calcutta Catholic School$3K$6K$12K$778

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Blessed Teresa Of Calcutta Catholic SchoolFerguson60%2268340020Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CTS Technology Solutions Inc$2K$5K$11K
Charter Communications$600$600$1K$1K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$720$720$720
Charter Advanced Services (MO), LLC$138$260$864
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$456$656
Charter Fiberlink - Missouri, LLC$605
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$68$216
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$4$45
AT&T Corporation

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.