Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$6K$6K$7K$10K$8K$29K$31K$23K$33K$13K$12K$8K$940
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%90%10%85%79%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111112122434331
Avg download speed (Mbps)500500500500505050505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)500500500500505050505050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$967$3K$964$4K
Telecomm Services$7K$6K$5K
Internal Connections$2K$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$6K$6K$7K$7K$8K$28K$28K$14K$28K$6K$6K$3K$940
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Luc Boys School$9K$6K$6K$6K$8K$210$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Luc Boys SchoolLampe85%1010500500Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CenturyLink CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC$29K$31K$14K$32K$8K$4K$3K
CenturyLink Qwest Communications Company, LLC$6K$7K$7K$8K
CenturyLink Level 3 Communications, LLC$6K$6K
Network Innovations, Inc$3K$6K$3K$940
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$210$629$574$803$2K$3K$2K
SMS Technologies, LLC.$8K
CMS Communications, Inc.$2K
JMARK Business Solutions, Inc.
The Mirazon Group, LLC
Questivity Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.