Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$1K$3K$696$15K$2K$4K$18K$672$480$672$928$3K$3K$3K$2K$3K$4K$3K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%25%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2213322111444435533
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00052550505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000231010105

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$928
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K
Internal Connections$896$2K$14K$2K$3K$18K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$580$696$696$700$745$913$528$672$480$672$744$744$1K$892$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
New City School$2K$3K$696$15K$2K$4K$18K$672$672$1K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
New City SchoolSaint Louis40%343141,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Business Systems Connection Inc$896$2K$14K$3K$18K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$826$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Charter Communications$672$480$672$744$744$1K$892$1K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, LLC$580$696$696$700$745
Cingular Wireless Inc.$62$367$329$340$341$322$64
GadellNet Consulting Services, LLC$2K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$913$528
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$39$171$109$78$78
LDD, Inc.$28$109$117
Internet 1st, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.